Is pulp fiction a genre? Why or why not?


Answer by Matthew Spencer:

Not specifically a genre, but a publishing model that supported many different genres. These included, but were not limited to, science fiction, horror, romance, westerns, adventure stories– in other words, the same mass market categories we see in contemporary fiction.

The pulp in pulp fiction refers to cheap paper that was developed in the late 19th century. That, along with more efficient printing techniques, made books and magazines more accessible to mass audiences. This in turn supported the growth of writers and publishers catering to popular tastes.

The terms dime novel and penny dreadful refer not only the cheap cost of these publications but also the overall quality of the writing. Pulp fiction was created and published on an industrial scale with little thought given to careful composition or literary taste. A single author working alone could churn out hundreds of stories or a dozen or more novels a year.

Though most pulp authors are now justifiably forgotten, there were aspects of the industry that encouraged artistic innovation, especially in fantastic or speculative literature. H.P. Lovecraft and Robert E. Howard, creator of Conan the Barbarian, are two prime examples of authors who worked within the pulp world and are still widely read today.

Then as now, publishers printed violent and, for the time, highly sexual content in order to boost sales. And also like today, educators, politicians and activists worried about the effect that reading these stories would have on children, particularly young boys. In the 50s, violent content from publishers such as EC Comics ignited a public reaction that led to the creation of the Comics Code, an important early example of a general rating system.

During the 50 and 60s, the trade in pulp fiction went partially underground, with more and more sensational subject matter. Magazines with stories catering to nudists, mercenaries, drug enthusiasts, beatniks and hippies, among other specialized demographics, appeared.

With the revolution in digital publishing  and the migration of print into the prestige  market, the term pulp is not completely accurate in describing the physical format of books and magazines, but aspects this publishing model do still exist today. Electronic publishing has lowered overhead costs and scheduling restrictions to such an extent that we might be seeing a contemporary renaissance in pulp fiction

View Answer on Quora


2 responses to “Is pulp fiction a genre? Why or why not?

  1. Your linkage of pulp publishing in the past and the new digital forms is intriguing. I’ve long thought that many of my favorite writers of the ’60s and ’70s could have never emerged in a decade or so later, given the direction of the industry.
    You have me thinking, too, of the parallels of pulp (commercially focused) and small press (literary) as the fertile margins where so much energy could thrive.
    My hope is that the real renaissance may be in a widened readership as more variety surfaces.

    • Seconded. I believe that some of the most exciting contemporary writing is coming from or at least influenced by the pulp tradition. Genre fiction is alive and well. And the literary market is catching onto digital technology in a big way. I’m still very much partisan for physical format books, but the amount of options available to enterprising writers bodes well for fiction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s